Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine ; 26(1):35-36, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2272301

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Early reports from China estimated that overall cardiac arrhythmia prevalence in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was 17%. A higher arrhythmia incidence (44%) was observed in patients admitted to intensive care unit. The industrial workforce was affected by COVID-19 to a great extent. A noteworthy proportion also suffered from cardiac abnormalities. Objective(s): To determine the incidence of arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 among the industrial workforce using remote patient monitoring technology. Material(s) and Method(s): This was a retrospective, observational, descriptive study of the industrial workforce from Telangana State, India. Approval of the institutional ethics committee was obtained. The need for informed consent was waived off. Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 by RTPCR and aged above 18 years were eligible. The five-day recording of lead-2 ECG on Vigo Monitoring Solution (Connect Care India Pvt. Ltd) was collected and analysed. Brady-arrhythmia during day time, second degree AV block Type-2 (Mobitz II) during the day time, complete heart block, wide QRST, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and sinus pause were considered "clinically significant". The other sub-types were defined as "clinically non-significant". The ECGs with regular sinus rhythm were interpreted as "normal". The prevalence of clinically significant, clinically non-significant and normal heart rhythm are described here. Result(s): Out of 240 COVID-19 patients who were on-board for remote monitoring, 216 (148 male and 68 female, mean age 51+/-15 years) met the eligibility criteria and only their ECG were analysed. Among them, 18 were known diabetics, 40 were hypertensive and 31 had both comorbidities. 112 were asymptomatic and 104 were symptomatic. The burden of arrhythmia was found clinically significant in 12 (5.6%) patients, clinically non-significant in 87 (40.4%) and normal among 117 (54%) out of 216 patients. Conclusion and Recommendation: The remote patient monitoring may be utilized as a tool for early screening of significant arrhythmia which are to be addressed immediately for better clinical outcome. These devices on being integrated into COVID-19 management strategies may contribute to patient satisfaction, emergency alerts, timely management, reducing mortality rate and enhancing the safety of healthcare providers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL